<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7月GQ:献给困困和海鹏</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pressmine.com/31881/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pressmine.com/31881</link>
	<description>WE THINK SHARING MEDIA IS FUN, DON&#039;T YOU?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Han Wei</title>
		<link>http://www.pressmine.com/31881/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Han Wei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressmine.com/?p=31881#comment-46</guid>
		<description>我这边GQ和Esquire比较方便，Details要走好几个街。我觉得GQ内容更轻松点，不端着，我比较喜欢。今天看新闻，说SBC把片中开杰克逊玩笑的段落都删除了，再等半个月好好看看。给你发了信息，注意查收啊：）</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我这边GQ和Esquire比较方便，Details要走好几个街。我觉得GQ内容更轻松点，不端着，我比较喜欢。今天看新闻，说SBC把片中开杰克逊玩笑的段落都删除了，再等半个月好好看看。给你发了信息，注意查收啊：）</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: media observer</title>
		<link>http://www.pressmine.com/31881/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>media observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressmine.com/?p=31881#comment-45</guid>
		<description>SBC之所以那样，完全是为了配合电影宣传。
GQ内容才是重点，比起Details、Esquire等好多了。
Aniston去Letterman节目时把领带送给了他。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SBC之所以那样，完全是为了配合电影宣传。<br />
GQ内容才是重点，比起Details、Esquire等好多了。<br />
Aniston去Letterman节目时把领带送给了他。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

